THE GAP IN THE MARKET
Most teams do not lack detection. The hard step is turning a finding into a decision someone will stand behind.
Tools that find
The gap
People who decide
QASO helps close it: Secure keeps a record of what it saw, Assure records how a code finding was checked, and SOAR drafts a response: the lowest risk class is logged by policy with no approval record; higher classes wait for the named people that class requires.
WHAT CHANGES FOR YOU
Nothing is ripped out. QASO sits beside the tools you already pay for and adds the missing step between a finding and a change.
You keep
QASO adds
01 / CHOOSE YOUR STARTING POINT
In plain words: the question each product answers and what you get back. Each product’s page has the full detail.
01 / SecureSecure · Exposure management
Like a building inspector: walks the floors you authorize and checks which doors open from the street.
You get: A record of what was seen, with what to look at first.
Not proof the network is complete. Pilot at your site; active scanning needs your written authorization.
Explore Secure
02 / AssureAssure · Code security
Like an editor who points to the exact line and checks it again.
Not yet approved for your source code, for installation at your site, or for production use.
You get: Code findings you can check line by line, marked by how far each was verified.
JavaScript and TypeScript only; tried on synthetic repositories.
Explore Assure
03 / SOARSOAR · Detection and response
Like a flight simulator: rehearse the fix, get the right approval, then hand it to your team.
You get: A drafted response. Approval follows its risk class; your team makes the change.
Not a security information and event management (SIEM) system. Pilot at your site.
Explore SOAR02 / FOLLOW ONE INVESTIGATION
Illustrative workflow. Each product can be used on its own. Your team makes any production change with its own tools.
01Secure
A scanner reports a vulnerable service. Is it reachable?
Secure turns one scanner report into the system it saw, the service it saw, and a possible path an attacker could take between them. That path is a hypothesis to check.
02Assure
What in the application supports the finding?
When you have the code, Assure points at the line behind the finding and checks it again. It does not prove what the running application does.
03SOAR
What should we do next?
SOAR writes the response and how to undo it. The lowest risk class is logged by policy with no approval record; higher classes wait for the named people that class requires. It does not re-check your systems after the change; you run Secure or Assure again to see the new state.
03 / WHERE QASO SITS
The software runs on your machines. Secure records what it can see on networks you authorize, Assure reviews application source code and the packages it uses (it is not yet approved for your source code, for installation at your site, or for production use), and SOAR drafts a response for approval by risk class. Your team makes the change.
Your network
Servers, laptops and computers, cloud, plant machines, and stored code, behind your firewall and network alarms. Plant machines use safety-critical protocols; confirm how they are collected before a pilot.
Your tools stay
Vulnerability scanner, laptop protection, code scanner, and activity logs keep running as they do today.
QASO, on your machines
Findings move between products by import: a file you hand over, or a connection you turn on. A rehearsal copy is a simulation, not a product.
Approval by risk class
Approval follows the risk class: automatic with a log for the lowest class, and named people above that (one, two independent people, or a decision owner plus a process engineer).
Your change process
Your team makes the change with the tools it already uses.
Intrusion detection systems (IDS), intrusion prevention systems (IPS), endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, firewalls, and vulnerability scanners detect threats, enforce policy, and report weaknesses. Secure adds asset and reachability context; SOAR supports investigation and a response approved according to its risk class. SOAR has two demonstration actuators, not a general action interface; your team makes production changes with its own tools.
Keep your event history, tickets, and risk register. SOAR reads logs you send (only derived counts are kept), packet metadata (source, destination, destination port, and size only) and NetFlow (records of which systems talked to which), never packet contents, and opt-in read-only SentinelOne and Splunk data (Splunk searches return up to 50 rows). It does not write back, and it is not a security information and event management (SIEM) system.
Assure examines source code, dependencies, and cryptography. Use source-linked findings to support developer review. Static analysis does not establish runtime exploitability or replace testing in the deployed environment.
Before you connect a system
A useful evaluation starts with one bounded case—not a promise that every workflow fits.
Deployment and purchasing questions
On-site security software. Local operation. Your team controls access and updates.
Leaders who need to know which systems are exposed and what to fix first, and the security architects and infrastructure engineers who run the checks.
When scanner findings lack asset context, ownership or a clear route to investigation. Connect inventory and assessment evidence before prioritizing work. Secure can show a possible path an attacker could take; that path is a hypothesis.
Not a replacement for endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, firewalls, identity controls or a basic scanner. Not a fit if you need unrestricted autonomous remediation or guaranteed discovery of every asset.
Choose one authorized case and a named owner. One network you are allowed to collect on, and the scanner results you already have. Install on-site, confirm local dependencies, start read-only and agree evaluation targets.
Results stay on your machines. You choose which files to copy out. Secure’s on-site collector keeps its records on those machines. A sealed installation has no internet connection; that setup passed validation on a virtual machine, and validation on physical hardware has not been run yet. Your teams bring in software and vulnerability updates such as the United States (US) National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Downloading an update directly needs an internet window you open on purpose, and that window is not sealed.
The systems Secure saw, the services it saw, and a possible path between them (a hypothesis), plus a written note of what was not seen. Measure time to see which systems a finding affects; how many systems Secure saw versus your records; what was not seen; whether a second run gives the same result. Agree targets first and record failures and gaps.
Hardware sizing (SOAR’s AI models run on your hardware; Secure has no built-in AI model but offers a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server an outside assistant can connect to), supported versions and adapters, offline update packaging, feed freshness, retention, SOAR console sign-in (a local username and password that works offline, or Google sign-in limited to allowed addresses; no identity-provider integration), recovery, licensing and support. Production deployment is on-site, not software as a service (SaaS).
Secure
Measure, do not assume. Time to see which systems a finding affects; how many systems Secure saw versus your records; what was not seen; whether a second run gives the same result.
Explore Secure →One-page PDF for your selected comparison. No account or form submission.
Secure evaluation brief Question: Which exposure should we investigate first? Starting input: One network you are allowed to collect on, and the scanner results you already have. Expected review artifact: The systems Secure saw, the services it saw, and a possible path between them (a hypothesis), plus a written note of what was not seen. Compare against: Existing manual investigation Measure: Time to see which systems a finding affects; how many systems Secure saw versus your records; what was not seen; whether a second run gives the same result. Safety boundary: Active collection requires an authorized local collector, explicit scope and policy. Candidate attack paths are hypotheses; rehearsal-copy results are simulations, not measured production outcomes. Deployment: on-site, with local processing in the air-gapped configuration; Secure has no built-in AI model, though it offers a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server an outside assistant can connect to. Your technology and security teams import approved software, vulnerability data such as the United States (US) National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A sealed setup passed validation on a virtual machine; validation on physical hardware has not been run yet. Optional outbound retrieval requires an explicitly connected window, and that window is not sealed. Before access: confirm hardware, offline update procedure, retention, owners, supported integrations and commercial terms. Acceptance: agree a baseline and target with the team before testing. Record gaps and reasons to stop, not just successful examples. Next step: share this brief with your evaluation sponsor. This download does not request an account or schedule a demonstration. Download the one-page PDF for the selected product and baseline. No investigation content or personal data is submitted.
04 / BUILT AROUND YOUR ENVIRONMENT
Explore technical architecture sheets with control placement, trust boundaries, implementation notes, and threat modeling. Validate the selected pattern against your own environment.
Explore deployment architecturesRuns sealed, with no internet connection, so processing stays on site. The sealed setup passed validation on a virtual machine; validation on physical hardware has not been run yet. Downloading an update is a separate step you choose to open; that window is not sealed. SOAR’s AI models run on your own hardware; Secure and Assure have no built-in AI; Secure offers a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server an outside AI assistant can connect to.
Local processing on machines you control. SOAR console sign-in: a local username and password, which works on a sealed site with no internet, or Google sign-in limited to allowed email addresses; no identity-provider integration.
Local collection, data residency, and controlled boundary crossings.
You enter how long the data must stay secret, how long a changeover would take, and the year you want tested; Secure compares those numbers. It also records which key exchange a service selects in a test connection. It does not list every kind of encryption you use, and it does not carry out the changeover.
PRODUCT READER PACK
The one-page overview, the evaluation brief, and the four-page manager guide are public portable document format (PDF) files. The full product books open Google sign-in, which a network without internet access cannot use.
YOUR NEXT STEP
